Today's hottest deals

Asus CM5675

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus CM5675  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM5675
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '21 at 05:48
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$40
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
43.9% Average
Memory 59.7
1-Core 79.9
2-Core 126
52% 88.7 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 162
22% 163 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Asus(1043 054F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1187 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Relative performance (0th percentile)
6.46% Terrible
Lighting 0
Reflection 27.1
Parallax 37.8
0% 21.6 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 25.8
Splatting 20
19% 23.7 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 6.46%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK2546GSX 250GB-$38
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LB014C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 8.6 2.3 17 26 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 26
Write 33.3
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 13.7
17% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
62% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.9% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 12.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 8.5
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM5675 Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM5675

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $234
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback