Asus P5Q-EM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5Q-EM  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090708
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 04 '21 at 21:56
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5450-$195
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
41.1% Average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 36
2-Core 68.8
38% 57 Pts
4-Core 96.9
8-Core 87.2
13% 92.1 Pts
64-Core 92.3
6% 92.3 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
EVGA(3842 1301) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 0.4
0% 0.73 fps
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.5 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 22 38 20 38 20 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 62%
2x232 500GB
113GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 114 112 99 115 107 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.8% Above average
Read 95
Write 93.5
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 109
64% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.83 MB/s
Raid0_2x298 640GB
26GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 23 23 22 23 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43% Average
Read 128
Write 24.6
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 22.3
34% 47.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.43 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 1.6
13% 4.47 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q-EM Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-EM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $371
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback