Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics78.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory58.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '21 at 22:34
Run Duration322 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$262
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 64.3
1-Core 52.3
2-Core 111
46% 75.9 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 208
23% 183 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$490
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.2% Very good
Lighting 66.7
Reflection 82.7
Parallax 199
54% 116 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 150
Splatting 131
124% 156 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 1TB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42B2S7JA
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,163
Write 1,311
Mixed 1353
355% 1,609 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 73.2
226% 75.1 MB/s
DQ Read 423
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 410
294% 379 MB/s
Poor: 185% Great: 373%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$130
2TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1439 1435 1438 1366 1395 1347 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 2,303
Write 2,282
Mixed 1,865
SusWrite 1,403
441% 1,964 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 56.8
174% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 339
246% 322 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 247%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
62% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 23.8
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 12.3
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 GAMING X Builds (Compare 3,982 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $782
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback