MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201208
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateDec 08 '21 at 13:07
Run Duration306 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
40.5% Average
Memory 48.1
1-Core 63.3
2-Core 116
44% 75.7 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 174
25% 184 Pts
64-Core 185
11% 185 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 19.2
15% 18.8 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 17.4
14% 17.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Jamesdonkey JD240LE 240GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JD2020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 11 9.6 8.9 17 9.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
45% Average
Read 314
Write 304
Mixed 300
SusWrite 40
54% 239 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 54
4K Mixed 15.4
73% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 36
68% 134 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GD2.1827WH.003 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.2% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback