Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X399 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '21 at 21:01
Run Duration301 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 76.7
1-Core 131
2-Core 262
85% 156 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 1,022
91% 768 Pts
64-Core 2,610
162% 2,610 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$497
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.09
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 240
Reflection 218
Parallax 230
195% 229 fps
Gravity 160
Splatting 140
131% 150 fps
Poor: 135% Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 3TB
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2505
Write 5,086
Mixed 2,184
735% 3,258 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 56.5
194% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 497
DQ Write 420
DQ Mixed 469
348% 462 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 484%
Apple SD0128F PCIe 121GB
53GB free
Firmware: A222821 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 314 292 309 315 314 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 663
Write 310
Mixed 264
SusWrite 310
86% 387 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 33.5
123% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 136
146% 247 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 110%
Amd-raid Array 7 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 66 66 66 66 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.7% Very good
Read 458
Write 503
Mixed 430
SusWrite 66.3
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 36.6
132% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 162
145% 213 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 241%
Amd-raid Array 8 249GB
232GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 66 66 66 66 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.6% Good
Read 404
Write 503
Mixed 398
SusWrite 66.2
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 34.8
128% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 158
140% 203 MB/s
Amd-raid Array 3 1TB
301GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 65 66 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 34.3
Write 66.1
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 64.2
35% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0
65% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 105%
SKYMEDI USB Drive 4GB
4GB free, PID 8628
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 13.4
Mixed 1
5% 7.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
35% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8MG07AA# 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
193% Outstanding
MC Read 75.8
MC Write 87.9
MC Mixed 66.8
220% 76.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 48.5
SC Mixed 33
100% 34.9 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 193%
Great: 193%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $773
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback