Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Samsung R510/P510

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Samsung R510/P510 (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG R510/P510
Memory	0.3 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080926
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '21 at 10:30
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	55%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P7350-$43 2,717 User benchmarks, average bench 35% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Memory 69.5 1-Core 29.6 2-Core 56.8 36% 52 Pts	4-Core 37.7 8-Core 54.6 6% 46.2 Pts	64-Core 54.2 3% 54.2 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9200M GS 1,057 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sanyo(144D C042) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.45% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.6 Parallax 1 0% 0.7 fps	MRender 0.5 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 0.6 0% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.45% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SP900 64GB 416 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.0.6c Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 132 Write 60.2 Mixed 95.5 21% 95.8 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 38.6 4K Mixed 16.2 59% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 65.4 DQ Write 61.1 DQ Mixed 53.5 43% 60 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 62%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18 39,749 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 46GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 52 41 47 49 54 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	Read 50.5 Write 56.5 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 49.2 36% 49.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 47%
FUJITSU MHZ2320BH G2 320GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 114GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 13 15 17 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 30 Write 23.8 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 16.8 30% 22.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 17%
ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB 217 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 643GB free, PID 0237 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 15 17 18 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 27.2 Write 25.2 Mixed 18.3 SusWrite 18 29% 22.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.1 68% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 4.6 14% 5 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 0.1 9% 3.07 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical R510/P510 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung R510/P510

CPU
Core2 Duo P8600Intel $42Bench 37%, 8,502 samples	2x
Core2 Duo T5750Intel $99Bench 32%, 2,050 samples	2x
Core2 Duo P8400Intel $20Bench 37%, 6,904 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9200M GSNvidiaBench 1%, 1,057 samples	6x
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	3x

SSD
X1 pro 256G 256GBDrevoBench 65%, 396 samples	1x
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	1x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	8x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $42

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400