Samsung R510/P510

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemSamsung R510/P510  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R510/P510
Memory0.3 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '21 at 10:30
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo P7350-$43
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Memory 69.5
1-Core 29.6
2-Core 56.8
36% 52 Pts
4-Core 37.7
8-Core 54.6
6% 46.2 Pts
64-Core 54.2
3% 54.2 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9200M GS
Sanyo(144D C042) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.45% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.6
Parallax 1
0% 0.7 fps
MRender 0.5
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 0.6
0% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.45%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP900 64GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0.6c
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 132
Write 60.2
Mixed 95.5
21% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 16.2
59% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 65.4
DQ Write 61.1
DQ Mixed 53.5
43% 60 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 62%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
46GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 52 41 47 49 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 50.5
Write 56.5
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 49.2
36% 49.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 47%
FUJITSU MHZ2320BH G2 320GB
114GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 13 15 17 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 30
Write 23.8
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 16.8
30% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13%
Great: 17%
ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB
643GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 15 17 18 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 27.2
Write 25.2
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 18
29% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.1
68% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 4.6
14% 5 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 0.1
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R510/P510 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R510/P510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $42
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback