Today's hottest deals

MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory55.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201208
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 14 '21 at 07:32
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 79
1-Core 140
2-Core 274
89% 165 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 836
82% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,059
66% 1,059 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
138% Outstanding
Lighting 189
Reflection 184
Parallax 189
154% 187 fps
MRender 207
Gravity 165
Splatting 134
134% 169 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 138%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pc601 NVMe SK hynix 256GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002111 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 284 266 260 260 253 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,466
Write 738
Mixed 539
SusWrite 302
168% 761 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 75.3
259% 94.4 MB/s
DQ Read 830
DQ Write 659
DQ Mixed 408
397% 632 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 191%
Great: 191%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$103
844GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1195 1237 1250 1279 1029 1197 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,314
Write 1,345
Mixed 1,270
SusWrite 1,198
289% 1,282 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 67
235% 86 MB/s
DQ Read 1,027
DQ Write 754
DQ Mixed 863
653% 881 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 238%
Great: 347%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
24GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 511
Write 478
Mixed 451
107% 480 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 60
204% 71.7 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 373
281% 376 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Hitachi HDN724030ALE640 3TB
329GB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 99 98 98 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 122
Write 124
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 97.4
66% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-16GIS BLS16G4D32AESB.M16FE F4-3200C16-16GIS BLS16G4D32AESB.M16FE 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37.4
96% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 38
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 20,128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $727
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback