Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion KE494AA-ABV dx2290MT (all builds)
Motherboard	ECS Livermore8
Memory	0.5 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.5 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20071008
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 18 '21 at 21:26
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	QAT-User
Background CPU	45%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 2.66GHz 56 User benchmarks, average bench 22% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	21.9% Poor	Memory 41 1-Core 14 2-Core 18.5 19% 24.5 Pts	4-Core 18.2 8-Core 22.9 3% 20.5 Pts	64-Core 22.7 1% 22.7 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 37%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 924GB free (System drive) Firmware: JU001C SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 21 68 29 77 103 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 137 Write 120 Mixed 51.7 SusWrite 65.8 68% 93.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.5 200% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 79%
Fc-1307 SD to CF Adapter V1.4 63GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 39GB free Firmware: Rev 1.4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 5.6 8 4.5 9.3 10 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	9.71% Terrible	Read 24 Write 12.5 Mixed 16.9 SusWrite 7.7 11% 15.3 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 2.4 511% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.71% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x1GB 12,162 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 1GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	8.24% Terrible	MC Read 3.1 MC Write 2.2 MC Mixed 2.6 8% 2.63 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 1.7 5% 1.67 GB/s	Latency 198 20% 198 ns
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.24% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Core2 Duo E4600IntelBench 34%, 6,872 samples	4x
Celeron 2.66GHzIntelBench 22%, 56 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples	2x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	2x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	1x

RAM
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	5x
1x1GBUnknownBench 17%, 12,162 samples	2x