bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardParallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1112 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160824
Uptime27.7 Days
Run DateSep 03 '17 at 17:14
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4650U
CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Memory 50.9
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 126
48% 83.2 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 141
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM)
ParallelsVM(1AB8 0400) 512MB
Driver: prl_umdd.dll Ver. 12.0.41296.0
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
4.71% Terrible
Lighting 5.27
Reflection 3.92
Parallax 7.69
4% 5.63 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 1.73
Splatting 10.8
6% 6.22 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 4.71%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Windows 10-0 SSD 137GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: F.1FB7X8 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 47%
Kingston DT R500 64GB
5GB free, PID 1654
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
7.17% Terrible
Read 15.3
Write 3.58
Mixed 5.57
8% 8.15 MB/s
4K Read 3.57
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.33
61% 1.66 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.17%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 8 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM 667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
46.8% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 16
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 12.8
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 157
25% 157 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback