Today's hottest deals

Asus P5KPL-AM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-AM  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100820
Uptime8.8 Days
Run DateDec 25 '21 at 19:22
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$50
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 74.6
1-Core 31.1
2-Core 62.4
39% 56 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 123
16% 123 Pts
64-Core 121
8% 121 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Asus(1043 836D) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 6
Parallax 1.1
3% 3.7 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 59 74 79 54 59 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.9% Below average
Read 213
Write 140
Mixed 147
SusWrite 65.4
32% 141 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 13.5
67% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 25.3
DQ Write 85.1
DQ Mixed 15.7
23% 42 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 70%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
29GB free
Firmware: 04.05G07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 79 81 56 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 96.2
Write 76.8
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 72.1
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.3
250% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 4.3
14% 4.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.2
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KPL-AM Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-AM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $63
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback