Today's hottest deals

HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive46.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory11 GB free of 16.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateDec 25 '21 at 23:05
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5649
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 61.3
2-Core 134
57% 92.5 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 344
36% 290 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 63%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
PNY(196E 11C7) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 18.7
15% 18.5 fps
MRender 15.9
Gravity 19.6
Splatting 17.4
14% 17.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 206 210 211 217 216 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.1% Average
Read 236
Write 200
Mixed 181
SusWrite 211
47% 207 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 14.7
48% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 175
138% 192 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
291GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 99 100 99 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 105
Write 50.2
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 98.3
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
247GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 111 111 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 119
Write 65.1
Mixed 62
SusWrite 111
66% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 18KDF1G72PDZ-1G6E1 ID:80 2C 18KDF1G72PDZ-1G6E1 50GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.7% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback