Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire XC-1660G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire XC-1660G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-1660G
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '21 at 02:18
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 59%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10105
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 127
2-Core 239
87% 153 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 654
67% 543 Pts
64-Core 653
40% 653 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29% Poor
Lighting 36.6
Reflection 39.5
Parallax 37.8
30% 38 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 26.8
27% 34.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1114 256GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21113000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 514
Write 565
Mixed 632
128% 570 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 49.3
164% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 678
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 136
204% 392 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 187%
Seagate Expansion SW 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: 0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 37 27 8.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 36
Write 39.3
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 25.1
25% 33.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.9
262% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G36C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 24.2
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 34.5
SC Mixed 25.1
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-1660G Builds (Compare 683 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-1660G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback