ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	65.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	54% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121109
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 14 '15 at 14:22
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 128 2-Core 244 85% 186 Pts	4-Core 468 8-Core 727 74% 597 Pts	64-Core 740 46% 740 Pts
Poor: 56% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410 30,815 User benchmarks, average bench 53% EVGA(3842 2888) 3GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5891 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Lighting 85.7 Reflection 76.6 Parallax 102 70% 88 fps	MRender 88.7 Gravity 67.6 Splatting 58.3 57% 71.5 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 60GB 1,562 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 112 52617463 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 -104264626062314 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3855 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 4599 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 31 51 60132884511 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 52617463 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 52617463 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 52617463 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 8749 (EA) Unknown 0 0 7303 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7303 (F2) Unknown 0 0 11729	54% Above average	Read 448 Write 74.2 Mixed 129 47% 217 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 61.4 4K Mixed 16.6 94% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 75.1 DQ Mixed 25.8 37% 68.7 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 69%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 282GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 4 (03) Spinup time 167 160 6641 (04) Start/Stop count 82 82 18757 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 54 54 33888 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 83 83 17176 (C0) Power-off retract count 191 191 7275 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 194 194 18748 (C2) HDA temperature 119 104 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 193 63 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 194 63 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 90 (C8) Write error rate 200 191 0	28.9% Poor	Read 52.4 Write 47.9 Mixed 49.2 38% 49.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.37 93% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 51%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 237GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 131 129 6433 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1950 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 18722 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1704 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 447 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 10 10 572277 (C2) HDA temperature 116 99 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 29 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	34.3% Below average	Read 60 Write 59.6 Mixed 68.1 47% 62.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 0.35 4K Mixed 0.14 44% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 59%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70 21,848 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 99GB free Firmware: 0001SDM5 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 221344192 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 4076 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 80 60 110892899 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 8017 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2000 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 12 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 38 219531640859 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 85 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 229 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 44 44 112909 (C2) HDA temperature 27 62 68719476763 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 119 99 221344192 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -38182259254986 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3927074985 (F2) Unknown 100 253 329615680 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	42.8% Average	Read 73.7 Write 75.6 Mixed 65.5 54% 71.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 0.43 4K Mixed 0.19 53% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 62%
TOSHIBA MK8025GAL 80GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 73GB free, PID 2506 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.9% Very poor	Read 27.1 Write 28 Mixed 11.3 27% 22.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 0.92 4K Mixed 0.24 41% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 13%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Maximus IV Extreme-Z Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 58%

Gunboat

Desktop

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 47%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	226x
Core i7-2700KIntel $89Bench 73%, 20,692 samples	65x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	42x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	39x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	22x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	15x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	25x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	15x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $737

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback