HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 04 '22 at 14:51
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 88.3
2-Core 173
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 326
46% 337 Pts
64-Core 331
20% 331 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.2
3% 4.03 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 160GB
148GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 162 149 127 148 135 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 160
Write 162
Mixed 42.7
SusWrite 147
29% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
3% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 45%
Hitachi HDT721016SLA380 160GB-$38
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ST1OA3AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 67 70 61 68 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 84.3
Write 74.1
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 66
47% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$25
113GB free
Firmware: 03.03E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 62.2
Write 29.7
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 30
28% 38.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173CB0-CK0 1315 CT51264BA160B.C16F M378B5173BH0-CK0 1315 CT51264BA160B.C16F 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.4% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 17.2
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 17.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback