Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80S7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 80S7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 04 '22 at 18:17
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
38.4% Below average
Memory 47.8
1-Core 46.8
2-Core 90.4
37% 61.7 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 169
23% 169 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 381E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.8% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 5.1
4% 4.03 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 7
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.8%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 230 223 255 236 264 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 337
Write 370
Mixed 332
SusWrite 243
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 20.9
80% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 352
265% 353 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 128%
AMicro AM8180 NVME 256GB
183GB free, PID 1101
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 33 37 32 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 34.9
Write 37.4
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 35.6
50% 36.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 8.2
610% 8 MB/s
DQ Read 16.3
DQ Write 21.5
DQ Mixed 18
1,404% 18.6 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KCRXJ6-HYJ 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
36.8% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.8
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.1
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80S7 Builds (Compare 328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80S7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback