Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 10 '22 at 16:40
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 177
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 347
46% 347 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400
Sapphire(174B 3000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.13% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 1.7
1% 1.93 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 2
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.13%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Addlink SATA SSD 120GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 999
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 341 163 15 37 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 439
Write 316
Mixed 389
SusWrite 165
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 81
4K Mixed 41.8
153% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 266
200% 267 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
344GB free
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 107 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 102
Write 102
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 106
67% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 61%
WD Green 500GB (2012)
295GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 121 135 135 134 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 119
Write 120
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 128
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CB8GU2666.C8PT 1x8GB
1 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.4% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 8.9
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback