Today's hottest deals

Samsung 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive14.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP350XAA-KF4BR
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '22 at 00:45
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7020U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
41.5% Average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 39.4
2-Core 64.8
38% 56.6 Pts
4-Core 101
8-Core 120
14% 110 Pts
64-Core 97.3
6% 97.3 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Sanyo(144D C804) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7987
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.27% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 5.2
4% 3.83 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 7
4% 5.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.27%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 240GB SSD 240GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN4763
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 47 21 8.7 4.9 7 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.8% Very poor
Read 0.2
Write 10.7
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 27.8
2% 9.8 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 14.3
23% 7.87 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 8.6
DQ Mixed 12.3
32% 74.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 96%
USB Flash Disk 32GB
30GB free, PID 2000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 7.2 11 13 11 14 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
6.94% Terrible
Read 23.9
Write 10
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 11.6
18% 15 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.94%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SMS4TDC3C0K0446SCG 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 6.6
22% 7.57 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 4.2
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA Builds (Compare 700 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 340XAA/350XAA/550XAA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback