Today's hottest deals

Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Killer  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160106
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 12 '22 at 19:28
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 72.7
2-Core 125
59% 94.2 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 432
42% 343 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 8465) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
35.4% Below average
Lighting 41.1
Reflection 39.3
Parallax 53.4
34% 44.6 fps
MRender 55.2
Gravity 51.7
Splatting 40.1
39% 49 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Digistor 256GB 256GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 146 164 162 165 165 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 216
Write 330
Mixed 217
SusWrite 157
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 30.2
105% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 28
DQ Write 88.4
DQ Mixed 36.7
34% 51 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 98%
Toshiba THNSNC128GBSJ 128GB
476GB free
Firmware: CJPA0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 497 609 633 596 633 690 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 49%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 147 164 163 166 166 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.4% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 12.6
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $449
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback