Asus P6X58D PREMIUM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P6X58D PREMIUM  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 14 '22 at 02:41
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 930-$157
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 65.6
2-Core 128
57% 92 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 312
33% 263 Pts
64-Core 325
20% 325 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 64 75 71 70 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 65.5
Write 81
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 71.8
49% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 62%
Hitachi HUS15603 CLAR300 300GB
4TB free
Firmware: C3A8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 70 66 63 58 56 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Write 1.5
Mixed 1.5
SusWrite 61.7
16% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 21%
Hitachi HUS72302CLAR2000 2TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: C1D8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 119 104 114 110 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 1.5
Write 118
Mixed 3.8
SusWrite 109
42% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.4
100% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
null MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
20% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 5.1
16% 5.77 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6X58D PREMIUM Builds (Compare 686 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D PREMIUM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $458
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback