Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics90.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH551
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '22 at 20:39
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 139
2-Core 256
92% 163 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 951
85% 717 Pts
64-Core 1,263
78% 1,263 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2009) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9729
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Lighting 111
Reflection 130
Parallax 116
90% 119 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 101
Splatting 99.1
92% 114 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 96%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSK 512GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0212
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 297 302 304 230 180 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 289
Write 273
Mixed 244
SusWrite 269
61% 269 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 21.7
70% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 29.4
DQ Write 34.8
DQ Mixed 31.7
24% 32 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 91%
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GB
394GB free
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1630 1114 787 788 787 786 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 1,744
Write 1,696
Mixed 1,341
SusWrite 982
323% 1,441 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 76.5
248% 83.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,135
DQ Write 813
DQ Mixed 940
711% 963 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 250%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 22.3
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 35
SC Mixed 26.4
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033 Builds (Compare 1,361 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback