Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Dell Precision WorkStation T5400 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0RW203
Memory	4.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080821
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '22 at 13:51
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5410 249 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Memory 63.3 1-Core 37.4 2-Core 68.9 37% 56.5 Pts	4-Core 149 8-Core 289 26% 219 Pts	64-Core 294 18% 294 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 84DC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 275 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.12% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 4.7 Parallax 1.7 3% 3.4 fps	MRender 4.4 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 3.3 3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.12% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 258GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP2OA3FF SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 64 76 107 95 99 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 134 Write 133 Mixed 63.6 SusWrite 88.5 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x2GB 38,297 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 6 of 8 slots used 12GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 5.3 14% 4.73 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 4.6 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X54601stBench 48%, 616 samples	21x
CPU: Intel Xeon E54101stBench 43%, 392 samples	18x
CPU: Intel Xeon E54201stBench 44%, 603 samples	15x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	6x

Value: 36% - Below average

Total price: $172