Today's hottest deals

HP 700-215xt

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 700-215xt  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140205
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateJan 17 '22 at 17:57
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 79.9
2-Core 165
61% 106 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 372
42% 330 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Nvidia(10DE 104B) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 460.89
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.8% Below average
Lighting 42.9
Reflection 46
Parallax 59
35% 49.3 fps
MRender 56.1
Gravity 52.9
Splatting 42.1
40% 50.4 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 345 317 281 195 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 399
Write 327
Mixed 313
SusWrite 266
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 24.7
83% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 353
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 134%
Samsung SM841N mSATA 512GB
114GB free
Firmware: DXM46D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 351 354 357 335 345 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
73% Very good
Read 392
Write 278
Mixed 295
SusWrite 346
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 21.4
70% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 188
177% 278 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 73%
Great: 95%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 2TB
581GB free
Firmware: 1012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 324 322 319 310 312 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 301
Write 253
Mixed 241
SusWrite 315
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 22
4K Mixed 15.6
52% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 143
104% 133 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
M378B1G73AH0-K0 Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
47.8% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 13.5
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-215xt Builds (Compare 105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 700-215xt

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback