Asrock B365M Pro4-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock B365M Pro4-F  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 22 '22 at 04:05
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 92.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 249
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 713
76% 605 Pts
64-Core 731
45% 731 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Lighting 66
Reflection 69.4
Parallax 63.8
54% 66.4 fps
MRender 67.6
Gravity 68.1
Splatting 63.8
54% 66.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 500GB-$60
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0704A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 300 42 26 66 9.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 457
Write 369
Mixed 381
SusWrite 135
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 22.2
89% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 57.6
93% 180 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 100%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
790GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 138 137 136 139 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 120
Write 122
Mixed 86.9
SusWrite 135
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 87%
PI-239 USB 2.0 Drive 750GB
455GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 40.2
Write 39.8
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 40.9
49% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MR[A/B]4U240FFFF16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 23.1
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 25.3
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 82%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B365M Pro4-F Builds (Compare 1,276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock B365M Pro4-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback