Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-P75-D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P75-D3  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120821
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 22 '22 at 16:08
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-2100 CPU @ 3.10GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 77.8
1-Core 61.6
2-Core 98.9
51% 79.4 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 137
22% 156 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Gigabyte(1458 3623) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.73% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 0.3
2% 1.57 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.73%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM841N 2.5 7mm 128GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM03D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 273 310 309 333 339 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 343
Write 237
Mixed 144
SusWrite 300
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 19.1
71% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 26.7
DQ Write 90.6
DQ Mixed 36.1
34% 51.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$55
121GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 91 93 90 95 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 94.3
Write 92.7
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 91.6
62% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.2% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 6.4
22% 7.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P75-D3 Builds (Compare 480 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P75-D3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $381
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback