Today's hottest deals

Asus P5Q SE2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics19.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5Q SE2  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090401
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 13 '17 at 14:42
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$85
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 36.3
2-Core 74.7
38% 58.5 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 150
18% 137 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Asus(1043 84BE) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.66
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 20.4
18% 19.7 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 43
Splatting 16.8
22% 28.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.4% Below average
Read 65.4
Write 55.2
Mixed 59.6
45% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.45
4K Write 5.48
4K Mixed 2.57
572% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 42%
Ccboot iSCSI 120GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 66.3
Write 53.3
Mixed 60.1
45% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.66
4K Write 4.49
4K Mixed 2.33
536% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 5.9
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 5.7
14% 4.77 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q SE2 Builds (Compare 128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q SE2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback