Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_X515JF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 24 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_X515JF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515JF
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '22 at 23:36
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 83%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 82.4
1-Core 125
2-Core 247
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 581
64% 507 Pts
64-Core 569
35% 569 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 1EFF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.57% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 11.6
Parallax 8.7
6% 9.43 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.57%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 256GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0901A3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 908 252 285 459 399 519 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1972
Write 807
Mixed 913
SusWrite 470
229% 1,041 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 30.2
212% 86.5 MB/s
DQ Read 898
DQ Write 841
DQ Mixed 534
493% 758 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 207%
Great: 214%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
WHS84S8AZ 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 12.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 13.9
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_X515JF Builds (Compare 402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_X515JF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback