PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 5.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z400 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch |
Memory | 8.3 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20101029 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Feb 01 '22 at 21:15 |
Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
Run User | SWE-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon W3520-$230
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
60.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro FX 3800
Nvidia(10DE 0661) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
|
5.86%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 96 98 94 93 MB/s
|
63.1%
Good
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$7
10GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 12 8 8.5 8.6 MB/s
|
14%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples | 585x |
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples | 553x |
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples | 504x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 283x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 162x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 140x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 139x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 74x |
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 68x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $255 |