Today's hottest deals

Samsung RC420/RC520/RC720

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemSamsung RC420/RC520/RC720  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RC420/RC520/RC720
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20110328
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '22 at 12:56
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 71
1-Core 67.6
2-Core 106
51% 81.4 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 162
22% 161 Pts
64-Core 155
10% 155 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0B2) 1.8GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
0.76% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 1.6
0% 1.13 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.5
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.76%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 20 18 21 36 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 55.5
Write 51.9
Mixed 43.4
SusWrite 25.6
33% 44.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 43%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 64GB
44GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.5 3.7 3.8 3.4 2.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.96% Terrible
Read 18.6
Write 1.8
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 3.4
9% 8.12 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.5
25% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.96%
Great: 10%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB
3GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.9 1.9 1.4 1.6 1.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1
Write 1
Mixed 1.5
SusWrite 1.2
2% 1.17 MB/s
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
25.5% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 8
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 8
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RC420/RC520/RC720 Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RC420/RC520/RC720

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback