PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Memory | 56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision T5600 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T5600 (all builds) |
Memory | 48.2 GB free of 56 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190630 |
Uptime | 3.5 Days |
Run Date | Feb 06 '22 at 02:52 |
Run Duration | 172 Seconds |
Run User | MEX-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() 1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
61.6%
Good
|
57% 96.9 Pts
|
46% 371 Pts
|
66% 1,071 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia Quadro M2000
Nvidia(10DE 1190) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.49
|
21.8%
Poor
|
22% 28.1 fps
|
22% 27.2 fps
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung-00CE M393B2G70BH0-YH9 M393B2G70BH0-YH9 M393B2G70AH0-YH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 56GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
34.4%
Below average
|
36% 12.4 GB/s
|
20% 7.07 GB/s
|
40% 100 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 99x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 82x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples | 64x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 52x |
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 49x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 47x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $316 |