Today's hottest deals

Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140808
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '22 at 14:40
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$104
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 185
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 421
46% 366 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.2% Below average
Lighting 41.8
Reflection 44.7
Parallax 39.8
34% 42.1 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 41.3
Splatting 36.3
32% 38.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE200 SSD 120GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMB1.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 67 13 66 12 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 313
Write 83.9
Mixed 157
SusWrite 31.1
32% 146 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 9.1
69% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 12.5
DQ Mixed 20.7
31% 61.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 82%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
235GB free
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 66 55 39 43 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 66.4
Write 70.3
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 56.3
45% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$14
134GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 105 107 108 105 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 96
Write 88
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 107
63% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
46.1% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 14.6
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback