Today's hottest deals

HP Z640 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Z640 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 212A
Memory91.4 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '22 at 02:49
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 89.6
2-Core 177
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 614
57% 473 Pts
64-Core 1,186
73% 1,186 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.7% Above average
Lighting 72.2
Reflection 79.5
Parallax 72.1
59% 74.6 fps
MRender 69.2
Gravity 73.1
Splatting 71.1
58% 71.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 864 815 827 829 831 834 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 2,121
Write 1,612
Mixed 1,462
SusWrite 833
336% 1,507 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 71.1
224% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 729
DQ Write 419
DQ Mixed 573
427% 574 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 232%
Great: 346%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40EB1-CPB M393A2G40EB1-CPB M393A2G40DB0-CPB M393A2G40EB1-CPB Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TFT1 Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TFT1 96GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.3% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 21
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.6
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z640 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,666 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Z640 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $509
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback