Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '22 at 11:07
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 78.8
1-Core 48.6
2-Core 97.1
48% 74.8 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 284
30% 239 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
EVGA(3842 1362) 768MB
CLim: 763 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 768MB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
13% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 20.2
Parallax 15.6
12% 17 fps
MRender 21.6
Gravity 16.9
Splatting 14.4
14% 17.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
233GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 108 117 115 117 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 308
Write 333
Mixed 271
SusWrite 112
58% 256 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 27.9
90% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 21.6
DQ Write 89.4
DQ Mixed 33.3
32% 48.1 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 50%
Great: 99%
WD WD15EVDS-73V9B1 1.5TB
777GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1
Mixed 2
1% 1.5 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.3
8% 0.15 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 54%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
489GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 113 117 117 117 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 100
Write 109
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 114
69% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 74%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
511GB free, PID 3320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 88 89 89 88 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 110
Write 110
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 88.5
121% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 0.7
260% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-007.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.9% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 11.3
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 9.5
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback