Samsung 950XCJ/951XCJ/950XCR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 950XCJ/951XCJ/950XCR  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP950XCJ-K01US
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210521
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '22 at 07:30
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 15%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 76
1-Core 133
2-Core 256
84% 155 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 588
62% 498 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Sanyo(144D C830) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7870
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.74% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 8.1
5% 6.27 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 11.1
7% 8.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.74%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sn730 SDBQNTY-512G-1004 512GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11100104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 632 409 417 406 391 394 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,622
Write 1,095
Mixed 1,085
SusWrite 441
236% 1,061 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 69
237% 87.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,122
DQ Write 687
DQ Mixed 874
659% 894 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 206%
Great: 254%
Flash Disk 3.0 2TB
2TB free, PID 1234,
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 4.7 5.2 5.4 5.8 2.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
1.58% Terrible
Read 3.5
Write 2.2
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 4.8
4% 3.25 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
4% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.58%
Great: 14%
WD My Passport 2627 5TB
311GB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 81 76 80 78 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 56.3
Write 70.8
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 81.5
90% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
35.8% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 9.5
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 12.3
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 950XCJ/951XCJ/950XCR Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 950XCJ/951XCJ/950XCR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback