HP ProLiant ML150 G2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP ProLiant ML150 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Nocona/Lindenhurst-VS/Hance Rapid
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060630
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '22 at 08:09
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.60GHz
Proc 1, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Memory 47.7
1-Core 31.5
2-Core 54.7
29% 44.6 Pts
4-Core 60.2
8-Core 65
8% 62.6 Pts
64-Core 61.8
4% 61.8 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 37%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ICP Drive #00 HA #0 2TB
673GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 38 38 38 36 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.3% Poor
Read 102
Write 74.8
Mixed 86.9
SusWrite 38.5
17% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 18.1
72% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 26.8
DQ Write 17
DQ Mixed 6.9
9% 16.9 MB/s
Adaptec RAID 1 750GB
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.4% Poor
Read 80.8
Write 46.8
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 20.9
34% 46.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 42%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$39
941GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.4 8.3 8.2 7.7 7.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 90.1
Write 19.6
Mixed 34
SusWrite 8.1
28% 38 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 86%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$39
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 24 24 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 97.7
Write 70.5
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 24
40% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 86%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 71 71 73 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 83.4
Write 89.6
Mixed 46.1
SusWrite 71.8
97% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
100% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.82% Terrible
MC Read 3
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 3.9
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 9.82%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback