ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP ProLiant ML150 G2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP ProLiant ML150 G2 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel Nocona/Lindenhurst-VS/Hance Rapid
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060630
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Feb 13 '22 at 08:09
Run Duration	260 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.60GHz 48 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Proc 1, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	28.9% Poor	Memory 47.7 1-Core 31.5 2-Core 54.7 29% 44.6 Pts	4-Core 60.2 8-Core 65 8% 62.6 Pts	64-Core 61.8 4% 61.8 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 37%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ICP Drive #00 HA #0 2TB 673GB free Firmware: 1.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 38 38 38 36 40 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.3% Poor	Read 102 Write 74.8 Mixed 86.9 SusWrite 38.5 17% 75.5 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 14.2 4K Mixed 18.1 72% 19.9 MB/s	DQ Read 26.8 DQ Write 17 DQ Mixed 6.9 9% 16.9 MB/s

Adaptec RAID 1 750GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 308GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.4% Poor	Read 80.8 Write 46.8 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 20.9 34% 46.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.1 206% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 42%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$39 12,609 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 941GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.4 8.3 8.2 7.7 7.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	28.2% Poor	Read 90.1 Write 19.6 Mixed 34 SusWrite 8.1 28% 38 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 86%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$39 12,609 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 24 24 25 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	34.9% Below average	Read 97.7 Write 70.5 Mixed 27.6 SusWrite 24 40% 55 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 88% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 86%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1.5TB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 71 71 73 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	Read 83.4 Write 89.6 Mixed 46.1 SusWrite 71.8 97% 72.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 100% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	9.82% Terrible	MC Read 3 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 2.9 8% 2.8 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 3.9 10% 3.63 GB/s	Latency 169 24% 169 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 9.82% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback