Acer Extensa 5620

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive40% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Extensa 5620  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Columbia
Memory1.5 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080703
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '22 at 15:45
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T8300-$27
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Memory 61.3
1-Core 38.8
2-Core 61.3
36% 53.8 Pts
4-Core 78
8-Core 74.2
10% 76.1 Pts
64-Core 77
5% 77 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 41%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
3 128GB SSD 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1128A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 94 74 84 85 78 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40% Average
Read 241
Write 206
Mixed 216
SusWrite 93.4
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 16.1
68% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 70.5
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 37.8
44% 74 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40%
Great: 83%
HGST HTS721010A9 1TB
92GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 23.1
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 25.7
34% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
14.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.37 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.1
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Extensa 5620 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Extensa 5620

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback