Acer Aspire M5711

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer Aspire M5711  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer FMCP7AM
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081201
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 19 '17 at 02:42
Run Duration288 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7300-$28
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Memory 37.4
1-Core 29.7
2-Core 52.3
25% 39.8 Pts
4-Core 75
8-Core 65.3
10% 70.2 Pts
64-Core 69.5
4% 69.5 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.74% Terrible
Lighting 7.67
Reflection 7.81
Parallax 2.53
6% 6 fps
MRender 6.81
Gravity 5.83
Splatting 5.09
5% 5.91 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.74%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
243GB free
Firmware: 01.0
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 96.7
Write 99.7
Mixed 92.2
72% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.41
102% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 58%
Nvidia STRIPE 298.09G0100 320GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0100
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 97.8
Write 112
Mixed 95.9
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.94
4K Mixed 0.2
52% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 60%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB
7GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
3.9% Terrible
Read 13.7
Write 5.53
Mixed 7.75
10% 8.98 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.003
4K Mixed 0.003
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.9%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 215
19% 215 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M5711 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M5711

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback