Today's hottest deals

HP Desktop M01-F1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Desktop M01-F1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87D6
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '22 at 08:55
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 76.8
1-Core 147
2-Core 294
92% 173 Pts
4-Core 585
8-Core 946
94% 766 Pts
64-Core 1,140
71% 1,140 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 93%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 87D6) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.26
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Lighting 15.3
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 24.4
12% 17.7 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 21.2
14% 16.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HBJD-00BH1 256GB
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1NFAV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1060 1119 1132 240 198 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,078
Write 975
Mixed 806
SusWrite 658
197% 879 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 54.8
158% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 885
DQ Write 954
DQ Mixed 809
639% 883 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 174%
Great: 200%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
9.7% Terrible
Read 26.8
Write 14.5
Mixed 12
SusWrite 16.5
22% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
35% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.7%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
43.7% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 11.3
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.7
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Desktop M01-F1xxx Builds (Compare 1,157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Desktop M01-F1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback