Today's hottest deals

HP 655 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 655 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1885
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366x768x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130917
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '22 at 20:02
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-1800 APU (2012 M.Za)
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Memory 42.1
1-Core 17.3
2-Core 36.7
22% 32 Pts
4-Core 35.4
8-Core 31
5% 33.2 Pts
64-Core 36.6
2% 36.6 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7340
HP(103C 1885) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.9001.1001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.02% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 1.7
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.02%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JE3OA50A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 41 41 43 45 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 70.8
Write 64.1
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 46.4
40% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 50%
Maxell External USB 3.0 1TB
11GB free, PID 0701
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 22 19 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 23
Write 23.5
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 20.3
27% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
56% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905603-035.A00G Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.13 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 3.1
9% 3.03 GB/s
Latency 193
21% 193 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 655 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 655 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback