Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory122.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '22 at 06:10
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$486
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 77
1-Core 140
2-Core 300
92% 173 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 1,171
104% 879 Pts
64-Core 2,975
184% 2,975 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$280
MSI(1462 397B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 132
Parallax 128
116% 134 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 103
Splatting 99.4
93% 116 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 107%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$109
547GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 955 1486 1511 1522 1527 1531 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 1,501
Write 1,503
Mixed 1,102
SusWrite 1,422
311% 1,382 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 80.3
269% 94.3 MB/s
DQ Read 683
DQ Write 949
DQ Mixed 272
358% 635 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 267%
Great: 295%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$117
931GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3211 3324 3321 2513 1696 1710 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
432% Outstanding
Read 2,738
Write 3,304
Mixed 2,953
SusWrite 2,629
657% 2,906 MB/s
4K Read 75.6
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 106
338% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,404
DQ Write 1,115
DQ Mixed 1,221
924% 1,247 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 432%
Great: 477%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 128 132 131 132 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 145
Write 134
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 130
138% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
35% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 53%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 133 133 132 132 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 142
Write 122
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 131
134% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
36% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 52%
Generic SD/MMC 16GB
14GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 21.2
Write 13.9
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 11.2
19% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 4.3
230% 4.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 15%
Generic microSD 64GB
57GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 1.6 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 19.9
Write 19.9
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 1.4
20% 15 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 5
333% 5.43 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 21%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 119 119 118 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49% Average
Read 115
Write 119
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 118
133% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M2E3200C16 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 37.6
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 37.3
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 105%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,743 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $833
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback