Today's hottest deals

Hp-pavilion WC956AA-ABF p6345fr

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHp-pavilion WC956AA-ABF p6345fr  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI IONA
Memory9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '22 at 10:42
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 86
1-Core 82.7
2-Core 157
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 290
39% 289 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Asus(1043 0386) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.43 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 M.2 250GB SSD
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 160 71 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.4% Average
Read 235
Write 213
Mixed 203
SusWrite 110
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 19.1
75% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 154
125% 176 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 91%
MDT MD2500AAJS-00L7A0 250GB
203GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 85 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 90.5
Write 84.8
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 84.7
58% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 50%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
710GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 97 99 98 98 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 100
Write 104
Mixed 64
SusWrite 97.1
67% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT4GC72B8PB0NF-CG CE80CE80 M378B5673EH1-CH9 0B830B83 NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG CE80CE80 M378B5673EH1-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 14.1
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 9.9
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WC956AA-ABF p6345fr Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion WC956AA-ABF p6345fr

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $121
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $118
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback