Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X571GT
Memory17.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200520
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMar 02 '22 at 06:32
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 81.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 243
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 660
70% 556 Pts
64-Core 668
41% 668 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1A81) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6617
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.06% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 63.6
Parallax 7.3
5% 25.8 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10.8
7% 8.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.06%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1430 1453 852 116 776 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,666
Write 1,573
Mixed 1,138
SusWrite 791
289% 1,292 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 74.4
250% 84.8 MB/s
DQ Read 446
DQ Write 796
DQ Mixed 407
370% 550 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 220%
Great: 290%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C22-16GRS 24GB
2400, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.5% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 18
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 18.8
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT Builds (Compare 775 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_X571GT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $66
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback