Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z270 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170720
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 03 '22 at 14:37
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 85.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 244
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 673
68% 553 Pts
64-Core 681
42% 681 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
ASRock(1849 5912) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
3.82% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 7.2
Parallax 8.3
6% 7.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.82%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$70
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3G37R5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 163 103 108 53 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 436
Write 363
Mixed 166
SusWrite 139
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 95
4K Mixed 28.9
139% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 162
144% 220 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 88%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$61
50GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 55 42 95 82 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 165
Write 149
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 67.1
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.8% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 10.7
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.2
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Pro4 - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $664
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback