Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '22 at 13:56
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900 12-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Memory 81.4
1-Core 145
2-Core 286
92% 171 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 1,082
98% 826 Pts
64-Core 1,995
124% 1,995 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
MSI(1462 C307) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 132
Parallax 121
99% 125 fps
MRender 89.3
Gravity 126
Splatting 111
90% 109 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X400 512GB-$99
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4140000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 255 255 255 247 229 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 481
Write 344
Mixed 266
SusWrite 252
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 32.7
108% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 219
180% 259 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 104%
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
64GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 147 148 142 142 138 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 451
Write 346
Mixed 166
SusWrite 144
61% 277 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 23
109% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 110
92% 133 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 95%
Adata XPG SX900 256GB-$164
119GB free
Firmware: 5.0.7a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 227 239 231 232 236 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 389
Write 292
Mixed 302
SusWrite 237
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 39.2
139% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 158
135% 201 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 90%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 161 161 159 161 162 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 120
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 160
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
KLEVV KD4AGU880-32A160X 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 45.1
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 40.5
120% 41.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 36.5
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,909 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $991
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback