User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHewlett-Packard
MotherboardFOXCONN 2A8C
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '22 at 12:59
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron E3300-$65
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Memory 53.9
1-Core 37.6
2-Core 77.3
35% 56.3 Pts
4-Core 61.1
8-Core 70
9% 65.6 Pts
64-Core 76.8
5% 76.8 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 4.1 5.1 2.8 6.8 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 112
Write 119
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 6.4
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 250GB (2008)-$80
226GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 5.5 5.7 3.5 9 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 79.1
Write 77.8
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 10.5
42% 56.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 4
13% 4.43 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 2.8
8% 2.9 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback