Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 149%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200723
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMar 05 '22 at 19:44
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F-$230
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 141
2-Core 277
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 940
90% 745 Pts
64-Core 1,510
93% 1,510 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Lighting 228
Reflection 212
Parallax 210
186% 216 fps
MRender 203
Gravity 157
Splatting 140
133% 167 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 154%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$50
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 757 101 138 26 13 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,514
Write 1,522
Mixed 1,080
SusWrite 200
241% 1,079 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 71.3
249% 89.5 MB/s
DQ Read 634
DQ Write 872
DQ Mixed 471
434% 659 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 183%
Great: 255%
Lacie Rugged USB-C 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1153
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 39
Write 41.1
Mixed 34.9
SusWrite 13.3
24% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.6
187% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 69%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
4TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 155 154 159 151 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 142
Write 150
Mixed 103
SusWrite 155
188% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.2
221% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 96%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$7
27GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 38 20 20 20 21 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 139
Write 101
Mixed 110
SusWrite 32.2
121% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 4.4
283% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
77.9% Very good
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 22
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 30.5
SC Mixed 24.9
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 3,879 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS (WI-FI) - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $800
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback