Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Predator G9-792

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Acer Predator G9-792 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Challenger_SLS
Memory	20.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151228
Uptime	6.5 Days
Run Date	Mar 06 '22 at 06:31
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	51%
CPU Throttled	96%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Memory 81.4 1-Core 59.9 2-Core 97.4 52% 79.6 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 309 32% 260 Pts	64-Core 263 16% 263 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980M 14,160 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Acer(1025 107D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.1% Poor	Lighting 28.3 Reflection 78.9 Parallax 42.6 23% 49.9 fps	MRender 36.2 Gravity 43.5 Splatting 46.2 35% 42 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-00000 256GB 3,145 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT2100Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 124 115 109 112 111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Read 387 Write 178 Mixed 177 SusWrite 116 47% 215 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 46.4 4K Mixed 19.3 77% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 362 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 172 148% 224 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 100%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 637GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 112 109 112 112 111 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Read 140 Write 133 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 110 74% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GB 4,393 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	59.4% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 23.3 MC Mixed 21.6 61% 21.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 16.9 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 77.9 51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator G9-792 Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G9-792

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	106x
Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 54%, 41,531 samples	1x

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	48x
GTX 980MNvidiaBench 41%, 14,160 samples	34x
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	25x

SSD
CV1-8B128 128GBLiteonBench 69%, 9,472 samples	12x
THNSNJ256G8NY 256GBToshibaBench 76%, 12,683 samples	10x
Raid 0 Volume 512GBIntelBench 191%, 18,578 samples	9x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	38x
HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 4x16GBHynixBench 73%, 569 samples	8x
M471A2K43BB1-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 71%, 938 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340