Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 2.50GHz 3 User benchmarks, average bench 22% U1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.2% Very poor	Memory 28.7 1-Core 22.3 2-Core 22.5 17% 24.5 Pts	4-Core 23.2 8-Core 23.6 3% 23.4 Pts	64-Core 23.8 2% 23.8 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Fujitsu MHV2120AH 120GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: 000000A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 33 31 33 33 33 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 23 Write 19.7 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 31.7 17% 23 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 20%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB 6,921 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 25GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 3.3 3.5 4.2 4.7 4.1 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	5.6% Terrible	Read 18.3 Write 9.5 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 4.2 12% 9.95 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.9 57% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.6% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1GB 4,189 User benchmarks, average bench 13% null MHz 1024, 256 MB Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	5.27% Terrible	MC Read 1.7 MC Write 1.6 MC Mixed 1.5 5% 1.6 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 0.9 3% 1.1 GB/s	Latency 262 15% 262 ns
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.27% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM