Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive283% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 06 '22 at 15:59
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 89.2
1-Core 131
2-Core 254
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 845
79% 657 Pts
64-Core 1,284
79% 1,284 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 192
Parallax 182
141% 182 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 179
Splatting 128
120% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G1X0E-00AFY0 500GB
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 611110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1922 1733 677 538 747 394 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 2,541
Write 2,111
Mixed 2,060
SusWrite 1,002
432% 1,928 MB/s
4K Read 71.4
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 82.5
284% 95.7 MB/s
DQ Read 935
DQ Write 516
DQ Mixed 396
383% 616 MB/s
Poor: 234%
This bench: 283%
Great: 494%
GOODRAM 240GB
64GB free
Firmware: SAFM22.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 424 427 425 425 426 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 453
Write 423
Mixed 314
SusWrite 421
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 24.8
84% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 142
124% 186 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 102%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
512GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 426 428 426 398 402 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 425
Mixed 408
SusWrite 413
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 44.3
145% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 180
142% 197 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 125%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$50
654GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1213 1410 1411 1411 1413 1313 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 1,470
Write 1,551
Mixed 1,089
SusWrite 1,362
308% 1,368 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 71.1
240% 83.1 MB/s
DQ Read 625
DQ Write 791
DQ Mixed 269
325% 562 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 248%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3200 C16 Series 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 36.7
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 29.7
SC Write 38.9
SC Mixed 32.4
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,932 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $945
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback