Asrock H310CM-DVS

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	60.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	20.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H310CM-DVS (all builds)
Memory	1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190514
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 06 '22 at 22:47
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	Memory 7.69 1-Core 39 2-Core 82.9 21% 43.2 Pts	4-Core 239 8-Core 391 38% 315 Pts	64-Core 566 35% 566 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% PNY(196E 133C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.65 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	60.7% Good	Lighting 90.8 Reflection 118 Parallax 94.3 74% 101 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 35.2 Splatting 0.3 35% 50.1 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253X1240G 240GB 3,895 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1022A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 90 28 36 22 28 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20.6% Poor	Read 141 Write 200 Mixed 125 SusWrite 49.8 29% 129 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 12.7 4K Mixed 5.2 20% 7.43 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 2.7 37% 87.7 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 92%
Seagate ST500VT000-1DK142 500GB 8,025 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 34GB free Firmware: 0001SDC1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 62 79 87 90 91 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	45.1% Average	Read 78.1 Write 79.7 Mixed 42.3 SusWrite 79.3 51% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 63%
ST975042 0AS 750GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 38GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 30 35 37 36 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 35.2 Write 30.5 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 31.6 42% 31 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 39% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 64D0GSFDL8G098 1x8GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 7.9 26% 9.07 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 5.3 14% 4.77 GB/s	Latency 426 9% 426 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310CM-DVS Builds (Compare 2,404 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-DVS

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	668x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	449x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	198x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	192x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	176x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	133x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	141x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	124x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	52x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	44x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	32x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	32x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $183

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16