Today's hottest deals

Acer Extensa 5230

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Extensa 5230  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Homa
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090319
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 07 '22 at 09:45
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 900
U2E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Memory 73.6
1-Core 7.5
2-Core 12.4
28% 31.2 Pts
4-Core 18.2
8-Core 12.9
2% 15.6 Pts
64-Core 1.4
0% 1.4 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 013C)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.3
0% 0.37 fps
Splatting 0.8
1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB-$15
273GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 35 30 26 22 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 47.1
Write 43.5
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 26.5
27% 37.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
81% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
4.19% Terrible
MC Read 0.3
MC Write 0.3
MC Mixed 0.4
1% 0.33 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 1.1
SC Mixed 0.2
1% 0.47 GB/s
Latency 93.4
43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 4.19%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Extensa 5230 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Extensa 5230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback